The Journal of Strategic Administration (JSA) follows a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality, validity, and academic integrity of all published manuscripts. The journal is committed to maintaining a transparent, fair, and efficient evaluation system.

Review Process

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to verify their relevance to the journal’s scope, originality, and compliance with submission guidelines. Manuscripts that pass this stage are assigned to qualified reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.

JSA uses a double-blind peer review system, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process. This ensures impartiality and eliminates potential bias.

Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers assess manuscripts based on the following criteria:

• Originality and contribution to the field
• Methodological rigor and validity
• Clarity and organization of the manuscript
• Relevance to administrative sciences and strategic management
• Quality of analysis and conclusions

Review Outcomes

Based on reviewers’ recommendations, manuscripts may be:

• Accepted without changes
• Accepted with minor revisions
• Revised and resubmitted for further evaluation
• Rejected

Authors are required to address all reviewer comments and submit a revised version within the specified timeframe.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts and review reports are treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not share, distribute, or use any unpublished material for personal or professional purposes.

Editorial Decision

The final decision regarding publication is made by the editorial team, based on reviewers’ evaluations and the overall quality and relevance of the manuscript.

JSA is committed to ensuring an efficient and ethical review process that supports academic excellence and knowledge advancement.